Buzz

Delaware Forum Selection Bylaws Under Attack

Antonio Yanez, Jr., Scott S. Rose and Todd G. Cosenza of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP


In recent years, Delaware corporations have increasingly adopted forum selection bylaws requiring that their shareholders initiate all corporate governance-related lawsuits in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The rationale for these forum selection bylaws is sound. The Court of Chancery is widely viewed as having significant expertise in resolving disputes under Delaware corporate law. Further, shareholder litigation-particularly challenges to mergers and acquisitions-has been brought more and more often in jurisdictions other than Delaware, often in multiple jurisdictions at the same time, which can be both costly and inefficient for companies.

The validity of forum selection bylaws is now under attack. Recently, several putative shareholder class actions were filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery asserting that forum selection provisions are invalid because they (1) are overbroad; (2) are waivable by the company but not by shareholders; and (3) were imposed by the boards unilaterally without a shareholder vote. The actions, which have been assigned to Chancellor Leo Strine, Jr., seek to have the bylaws declared invalid and unenforceable.

The actions filed in Delaware present the first opportunity for the courts in that state to consider squarely the validity of this type of forum selection bylaw. Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Court of Chancery recently suggested that "if boards of directors and stockholders believe that a particular forum would provide an efficient and value-promoting locus for dispute resolution, then corporations are free to respond with charter provisions selecting an exclusive forum for intra-entity disputes." In re Revlon, Inc. S'holders Litig., 990 A.2d 940, 960 (Del. Ch. 2010). But no Delaware court has ruled on the validity of such a provision.

At the same time, at least one court outside of Delaware has found a forum selection bylaw to be invalid. In Galaviz v. Berg, a federal court in the Northern District of California refused to dismiss a derivative action against Oracle Corporation on the basis of a bylaw providing that "'[t]he sole and exclusive forum for any actual or purported derivative action brought on behalf of [Oracle] shall be the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware.'" 763 F. Supp. 2d 1170, 1172 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011). The court declined to enforce the forum selection provision because it "was unilaterally adopted by the directors who are defendants in this action, after the majority of the purported wrongdoing is alleged to have occurred, and without the consent of existing shareholders who acquired their shares when no such bylaw was in effect." The court went on to hold that under those circumstances "there is no basis for the Court to disregard the plaintiffs' choice of forum" and defer to the bylaw provision. Id. at 1174.

Forum selection bylaws provide significant benefits to companies and their shareholders, especially given that shareholders' attorneys have increasingly filed shareholder actions outside of Delaware, increasing the expense and inefficiency of litigation to the detriment of all parties.

Given that forum selection provisions are relatively untested in Delaware and have been rejected by one court outside of Delaware (at least on the specific facts at issue there), the recently filed cases may provide needed clarity on this issue. In all events, it is important for corporations and their boards to monitor developments in these cases in assessing the utility of forum selection clauses in corporate bylaws going forward.


Antonio Yanez, Jr., Partner, ayanez@willkie.com

Antonio Yanez, Jr. is a partner in the Litigation Department of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. Mr. Yanez concentrates on securities and financial reporting matters as well as mergers and acquisitions litigation. Mr. Yanez's practice includes representation of issuers, officers, directors, underwriters, accounting firms, and others in securities class actions, M&A cases, SEC proceedings, and other litigation and regulatory matters. His litigation experience includes cases in federal, state, and bankruptcy courts around the country. His practice also focuses on internal and independent investigations of financial reporting, accounting, and related issues. Mr. Yanez has particular experience in matters with an international dimension. He has experience in securities, financial reporting, and other matters in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. Mr. Yanez speaks fluent Spanish and conversational Portuguese. Mr. Yanez is ranked "Up and Coming" among leading individuals practicing in the area of Litigation: Securities in New York by Chambers USA (2010-2011).

Full Bio

Scott S. Rose, Partner, srose@willkie.com

Scott S. Rose is a partner in the Litigation Department of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP in New York. Mr. Rose specializes in complex commercial litigation, securities litigation, SEC and other governmental and regulatory investigations, and internal investigations. Mr. Rose also has experience in accountant's liability, corporate governance, and employment litigation. He has represented issuers, officers, directors, underwriters, and accounting firms in securities class actions, derivative suits, SEC proceedings, DOJ investigations, and other regulatory proceedings. Mr. Rose is ranked a "Rising Star" among Metro New York attorneys by Super Lawyers (2011).

Full Bio

Todd G. Cosenza, Partner, tcosenza@willkie.com

Todd G. Cosenza is a partner in the Litigation Department of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP in New York. Mr. Cosenza specializes in complex financial litigation, with a focus on securities class action litigation. His practice includes representation of issuers, officers, directors, underwriters, and accounting firms in securities class actions and other related matters. He also has experience in a broad range of commercial disputes, including insurance coverage, banking, real estate, copyright, and antitrust matters. Mr. Cosenza is a member of the New York City Bar Association's Securities Litigation Committee, its Credit Crisis Litigation Subcommittee, and the Programming Committee for the Federal Bar Council. He is the author of a number of articles on recent developments in the federal securities laws. Recently, Mr. Cosenza received Fordham Law School's "Rising Star Award," which recognizes the extraordinary achievements of a distinguished Fordham Law School alum in the area of Private Practice who has graduated within the last 15 years.

Full Bio

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (www.willkie.com) was founded more than 120 years ago upon principles that still characterize our practice today. Our founders and memorable colleagues, like Wendell Willkie and Felix Frankfurter, established a strong foundation of integrity, innovation, pragmatism, flexibility and intellectual agility designed to continually meet the ever-changing business needs of our clients. These values form our approach to providing legal and business advisory services today. We continue our tradition of excellence by keeping nimble, working collaboratively together, with respect and professionalism, and by integrating this philosophy into our client relationships. Our clients not only rely on us for our creativity, skill, leadership, decisiveness and high-quality work, but because they know we are solution-oriented and we get the job done efficiently and effectively.

Material in this work is for general educational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances, and reflects personal views of the authors and not necessarily those of their firm or any of its clients. For legal advice, please consult your personal lawyer or other appropriate professional. Reproduced with permission from Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. This work reflects the law at the time of writing.